• I live in Michigan
  • My occupation is Software Engineer
  • I am Male

Hi there, Nebiksrazu!



Welcome to the Diablo Wiki, and thank you for your contribution on Shrine of Rakanishu! There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements. We are happy you decided to create an account to make yourself part of the community. Please, take the time and introduce yourself.

Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
Questions? You can ask at the community portal talk page, on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on User talk:Hawki!
Need help? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit. And take a gander at the Manual of Style for an overview of the type of writing style required in our pages.
And last but not the least, please use the Forums for any kind of discussion regarding the inner workings of this wiki and get an idea of what to do next. It is always a good idea to use the Shoutbox widget to let others know that you're online or even just to say Hi.

We're really happy to have you here, and look forward to contributing with you!

- The Diablo Wiki staff


I'm not Hawki, but since I made these maintenance templates, I'll respond. There is no obsolete template, but we do have {{Cleanup}} which may work as an alternative. As for images, there is {{NoImage}}.
◄► Tephra ◄► 15:22, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

I've previously considered whether we should keep obsolete information as archival trivia, and I really feel inclined to say discard it. However, as this is a wiki, anyone else may choose to keep it if they feel like doing the work themselves. I suppose an obsolete template would be useful considering how much D3 changes. You can create a new template if you want to, or I'll create one if you don't.
◄► Tephra ◄► 17:16, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
It works for now. I'll probably edit it a little later to more closely resemble the other templates and add in a picture of something obsolete (got any suggestions?).
◄► Tephra ◄► 17:28, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
I was thinking something from the Diablo series.
◄► Tephra ◄► 18:14, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
As per your comments on my talk page, see Tephra's for my general response.--Hawki (talk) 04:35, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

Link templates

You should familiarize with these templates. They make linking to certain pages shorter and easier.
◄► Tephra ◄► 22:26, March 31, 2014 (UTC)

Book of Cain

Part apology, part explanation - as per your Book of Cain edit, for the sourcebook, I think it should be just "Book of Cain" rather than "Diablo III: Book of Cain," as per standard novel naming. For the "Book of Cain" D3 item, I've changed the title to "Book of Cain (Diablo III)," as brackets are used more often when there's overlapping titles when it comes to games (abilities are a good example of this.

Unforuntately I think I deleted the D3 item article while renaming the sourcebook. Sincere apologies on that. Please recreate it by all means, but under the new heading I provided (I've altered the links in the item articles to go this way).--Hawki (talk) 21:29, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

Editing on difficulty levels

First off, thanks for adding the info, and please don't panic with the edits I'll make in the next few days.  Having an article for each Difficulty level in Diablo III.  I find that it scatters the information, so I'll be moving all the info you posted to a single article.  Your data won't be lost, but I think a separate article on each difficulty level is just too little info.

Breywood (talk) 11:55, April 3, 2014 (UTC)


Minor note with the ref reverts, I feel it's best to keep official sources on some articles rather than relying on the article mode itself, so to speak. E.g. Adventure Mode - keep official comments rather than the support of an entire mode as a ref. Doesn't apply to everything of course (e.g. items and acts), but in other cases, lack of ambiguity will make the article more verifiable.--Hawki (talk) 21:15, April 4, 2014 (UTC)

Page protection

Diablo (Game) doesn't appear to be suffering from significant vandal attacks. There was one vandal this month, one last month, and the one before that hit in August of last year. Protecting pages is not something to do on a whim, as it interferes with the very concept of a wiki - something which everyone can edit. I will keep on eye on Diablo (Game), and if I see more vandals than quality editors, I will consider protecting it, but I do not think it is necessary at this point.
◄► Tephra ◄► 16:44, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

There have been plenty of constructive edits since August of last year.
◄► Tephra ◄► 22:48, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

And then that IRL thing hit.

Thanks for getting in contact with an admin about the recent vandalism.  I've been trapped in that dimension called "Real Life" at the moment so I wasn't able to reply sooner.  I think if we just keep a slightly closer eye on it and revert it when non-constructive edits are made it should be fine for the moment.  We used to have a similar problem with someone making non-constructive edits on Charsi's article.  On a side note, I really should get that article on difficulty tidied up on wordpad and then pasted over the present mess soon.  It can be intimidating at times.
Breywood (talk) 23:45, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.