FANDOM


Perhaps pages Rune and Rune Words should be merged into one article. If someone is looking for informations about runes, he would like to have them on one page, not two. Rune words are essential use for runes, informations about runes and about rune words just should not be separated. IMHO of course :] Shrooman88 16:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Splitting?? Edit

Bit of a dilemma here... Should this be split up or should Runes (Diablo III) be merged here??? "The Diablo Wiki needs you 4L!!!", MOBOKILL (Ramblings) 17:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, huh... I forgot Diablo I runes were located on this page too. Umm, maybe they should be merged :/ CCHoudini! My Talk 18:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
The runes on D3 is more like an add on to the basic attacks like bash and hammer of the ancient.206.176.118.57 22:29, November 13, 2013 (UTC)nnnnn

Groups of Runes Edit

Great work. Its accurate too, and looks great!

My only suggestion is to orginize the rune template into 3 groups of rarity, vs 3 other groups.

Where is the template to edit? Thanks.67.180.156.9206:55, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

Which of the templates are you talking about?
◄► Tephra ◄► 12:03, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

Split? Edit

The functions of the runes in the three games are very different. I'd say that this warrants creating three separate pages. Brainwasher5 (talk) 15:41, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

As long as there's some navigation just in case someone's looking for info on the other games, I think it's a great idea.
Breywood (talk) 16:40, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.